‘Then it’s a simpler government, uniquely Filipino, still democratic, but more effective and efficient. What do you think?’
WHILE the resolution filed by Rep. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo calling for charter change is quite likely motivated by ill-will rather than long-term systemic change, let me get this thought off my mind and share it with my readers. I have always been batting for simplifying government, and in small circles of friends, I have articulated so.
Maybe at the appropriate time (2011, perhaps), we should really sit down and revise our current fundamental law. There just are too many outmoded prohibitions in the Constitution, including those that pertain to ownership of land and sanctions against foreign investments that need to be reviewed in the light of changed and still evolving word economic conditions.
But let me in this article propose a simplified political structure.
I believe in the presidential form of government. Filipinos to my mind will always reserve for themselves the right to elect their supreme leader, the president, and will not delegate this to a group of legislators in parliament. So be it. Let us respect that sovereign will.
But let us go back to the two-party system. We have had twenty-four years of a multi-party system where still no ideological distinction separates one party from the other. Instead, political parties have degenerated into flags of convenience utilized by those with unstoppable presidential ambitions as vehicles for their candidacies.
Let us have block-voting for executive positions. Thus, we cannot cross party lines in our choice of vice-president for a president, or vice-governor for a governor, and a vice-mayor for a mayor. They must belong to the same political team or party. Thus, the ballot that needs to be filled for mayor will automatically credit the same vote for his team-mate, all the way to governor and president. It is not emphasis on checks and balances that should take precedence over teamwork and cohesion in management.
And let the vice-president be the presiding officer of the Senate, the vice-governor and vice-mayor presiding officers (as they do) of the respective legislative bodies.
But here I differ, in a most radical way:
I am for abolishing the election for municipal councilors, city councilors, provincial board members. In their stead, I propose that barangay chairmen compose the municipal and or city councils, and municipal mayors themselves compose the provincial board. How does this work?
First, let us prolong elective terms of everybody to six years. We will then hold one election for barangay chairmen and their kagawad, and another for president and his vice-president, regionally-elected senators, governors and their vice, city mayors and their vice, and municipal mayors with their vice-mayors likewise. Elections will be held every three years; one for barangay officials and the other for all others from president down to the mayor-vice-mayor team.
Thus, the barangay elections (one chairman and his vice, six kagawads, and no Sangguniang Kabataan) means that the neighborhood communities will write down only seven names in their ballots, easy and quick enough for uncomplicated canvass. They will sit for six years, with as many re-elections as their constituents want (no term limits). Of course, the number of barangays must be rationalized properly, unlike places like Manila with as many as 897 barangays, where a small street or a couple constitute one barangay already.
The barangay chairs automatically constitute themselves into the local legislative body or council. If there are only twelve barangays (some towns have even less), then they constitute the municipal council, with the elected vice-mayor as presiding officer. It there are so many (as in big cities), then they could elect among themselves, taking turns of three years even, two sets of councilmen among themselves. For instance, if Manila’s 897 barangays could be trimmed down to say, 180 barangays, with 30 barangays per district, the thirty chairmen elect among themselves 12 peers who will comprise their representatives to the council, with the first six serving a term of three years, and the next 6 serving the next three years.
Let’s face it. The barangay officials are the immediate governance link to the citizen. The mayor can delegate as much authority and responsibility as is needed to make the delivery of services more efficient and more organized. Why should there be another layer of policy-makers in the form of an elected city or town council? This change will make both elections and the local payroll much, much cheaper.
Similarly, all municipal mayors, being stakeholders by right in the province, should constitute the provincial legislature that approves the provincial budget, among other things, with the elected vice-governor acting as presiding officer. If there are far too many towns in a province like Pangasinan, or Cebu, or Bohol, then just like in the towns or cities with too many barangays, they could be divided in service periods of three years each within their six-year term.
Here’s another proposal that will get congressmen mad at me: Let us have a unicameral legislature for the first 12 years of the government under the new Constitution. That unicameral body ought to be a regionally-elected Senate. There are at present 17 regions, namely Regions 1, 2, CAR, 3, 4, 4-A (Mimaropa), 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, Caraga, ARMM and NCR. Let us elect three senators per region, for a total of 51 senators, regardless of area covered or population. This way, there will be 3 senators for huge Regions 3, 4 and NCR, the same number of 3 senators for lesser-populated but infinitely poorer CAR, ARMM, Caraga, 8 and 4-A.
This equal representation will allow more resources and attention to redress the focus in policy-making as well as budgeting in favor of a more equitable distribution of resources for the heretofore economically neglected regions. In time, they should be able to catch up in terms of infrastructure with the other wealthier and bigger regions.
Meanwhile, for twelve years (longer if the public consents in a referendum), there will be no House of Representatives. Just a Senate of 51 senators elected region-wide and not nationally, presided over by the elected Vice-President. The two political parties need not draft celebrities and tinseltown retirees as much as they do now. Instead, the regional population should be able to discern capabilities and character more closely because they have to choose among those who actually reside in their areas. Again, cheaper cost of electing senators, and a cost-efficient legislature as well.
Hence, in the national elections, we elect a president with his vice-president both from the same party; three (3) senators where we can vote crossing party-lines from those presented by their political parties (the highest 3 among the candidates); a governor along with his vice (or city mayor and his vice); a mayor along with his team-mate. That is all. Five names if you vote in a chartered or highly-urbanized city. Six if you vote in a municipality which is politically integrated to the province.
That simple. Automated or manual, results should be much easier and less prone to manipulate in the canvass. Three years later, we elect one barangay chair, with his vice-chair, and 6 kagawads. Seven names. Unlike our present synchronized system where we elect as many as thirty choices from a long list of as many as 350 names.
No term limits for barangay, municipal, city, gubernatorial and senatorial level officials need be provided in the new Constitution. One 6-year term for the President, just as we have at present. While elections will be held every three years, the elected officials serve for six years, not too short to be able to make a difference, and not too long if he makes no difference for better, and should be booted out in the next elections. A provision for recall may also be legislated.
Meanwhile, the Senate can rationalize the number of congressional districts for the time there will be a functional House of Representatives. My reason for disabling the bigger House in the meantime, or twelve years (two terms) after the ratification of the new Constitution is to give the nation a breather from too much politics, and the nation’s treasury from too much pork barrel.
Who knows? The people might find a simplified government structure with far less elected officials a boon during those twelve years, and find adding a House of Representatives with their myriad party-list members a bane.
Then it’s a simpler government, uniquely Filipino, still democratic, but more effective and efficient, both in terms of service and cost.
What do you think?
(banayo_at@yahoo.com)
LITO BANAYO
MALAYA Column for Tuesday, 06 July 2010